Study: Global warming will cut wheat yields

OSLO — Global warming will reduce average wheat yields by 6 percent for every 1.8-degree increase in temperature, a study by a U.S.-led team of scientists said today.
That would be a bigger-than-expected brake on food production.
The decrease would be 46.2 million tons from a harvest of 771 million tons of wheat worldwide in 2012, highlighting a need to breed more heat-tolerant crops.
In recent decades, wheat yields have declined in hotter sites such as India, Africa, Brazil and Australia, more than offsetting yield gains in some cooler places, including parts of the United States, Europe and China, the study showed.
“Global wheat production is estimated to fall by 6 percent for each degree Celsius — 1.8 degrees Fahrenheit — of further temperature increase,” according to the scientists, who used wheat-crop computer models and field experiments.
They said there are many options to limit the damage from higher temperatures involving the development of wheat types that tolerate additional heat, especially in warm regions.
The study examined only temperatures, not carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas emitted by the burning of fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide is an airborne fertilizer.
The study also did not try to assess possible changes in rainfall patterns.
“Wheat-yield declines in response to temperature impacts only are likely to be larger than previously thought and should be expected earlier, starting even with small increases in temperature,” the researchers wrote.
Joergen Eivind Olesen, a professor at the University of Aarhus in Denmark, was one of the authors. He said the focus on temperature alone meant the study “is not the complete picture.”
“Even so, in many parts of the world, there would still be a decrease in yields” even with small temperature rises, he said.
In March, the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projected that yields of wheat, rice and maize would fall overall with temperature increases of 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit above late 20th century levels — a higher threshold than in yesterday’s study.
Average world temperatures have risen by about 1.5 degrees since the Industrial Revolution and are projected to rise by between 0.5 and 8.6 degrees in this century, depending on whether governments reduce emissions.
http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/business/2014/12/23/study-global-warming-will-cut-wheat-yields.html

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Climate Change Skeptics Lash Out At New Global Warming ‘Hiatus’ Study That Questions Ocean Temperature Measurements

Image
Share on facebook 227 Share on twitter 22 Share on linkedin Share on google_plusone_share More Sharing Services 128 An estimated 35,000 walruses are pictured crowding on a beach near Point Lay, Alaska, because of a lack of sea ice in this September 2014 photo. A study published June 4, 2015, refuting the notion that the Earth’s temperature rise has been interrupted since 1998 was lambasted by the usual skeptics and their supporters.  Corey Accardo/NOAA/NMFS/AFSC/NMML/Via Reuters A new climate study was released Thursday that refutes the claim that there’s been a slowdown, or “hiatus” in the rate the Earth is warming, but some conservative-leaning media sites skipped covering the study itself and chose instead to promote the views of the minority of climate change deniers, such as  Christopher Monckton . For example, the Drudge Report, an immensely popular headline aggregator operated by conservative Matthew Drudge, promi...
Read more

Global warming could drive world temperatures up 7 degrees by 2100

Another piece of the  global warming  puzzle has been revealed. According to new research published on Jan. 1 in the journal  Nature , increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will reduce the number of clouds that form. This, in turn, will cause temperatures to rise much higher than previous climate-change models have predicted. According to this new research, global temperatures could rise 4 degrees Celsius or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit by the year 2100, and twice that by 2200. Lead researcher Steven Sherwood at the Climate Change Research Center at Australia's University of New South Wales, told  The Guardian  that this level of climate change would be "catastrophic rather than simply dangerous. For example, it would make life difficult, if not impossible, in much of the tropics, and would guarantee the eventual melting of the Greenland ice sheet and some of the Antarctic ice sheet."   In a  news release , Sherwood said this new...
Read more

Why Is Critical Technology to Stop Global Warming Stalled?

Image
Pumping CO2 underground can help fight climate change but remains untested for the most part March 12, 2015  | By  Howard J. Herzog  and  The Conversation US Injection of CO2 and other gases into geological formations has been practiced for many years.  Credit:  SaskPower There are many uncertainties with respect to global climate change, but there is one thing about which I have no doubts: we will not solve climate change by running out of fossil fuels. Understanding this leads to three posible pathways we can follow to lower greenhouse gas concentrations, and explains why I’ve chosen to focus  my research  on carbon capture and storage. We can: continue to burn fossil fuels with little or no restrictions. We will blow by atmospheric CO2 concentrations of 450 parts per million (ppm), the level many scientists think is dangerous to exceed, and we will keep on going. We have enough fossil fuels to easily go above 1,000 ppm. The impac...
Read more