Dutch Sue Own Government For Lackluster Climate Change Policies

A group consisting of 900 Dutch citizens has filed a suit against the government of the Netherlands for its lack of effort in addressing concerns about climate change - something the Dutch consider to be a violation of their human rights.
The lawsuit, filed by the Urgenda Foundation, is the first instance in Europe in which a national government is made responsible for its unproductive climate policy.
According to Urgenda, the suit demands that by 2020 the Dutch government cut greenhouse gas emissions by 25 to 40 percent, levels comparable to that of 1990. This amount is in compliance with the ideal levels agreed on by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC).
The foundation argues that the government has violated Dutch human rights and tort laws by not "contributing its proportional share" to address the issue of global warming.
Urgenda hopes that the "Climate Case" will set a precedent for people around the world to use established laws in pressuring their governments to do their part in halting climate change.
Allowing the planet's average temperature to rise by more than 2 degrees Celsius, the foundation states, "will lead to a violation of fundamental human rights worldwide."
An international group of eminent jurists consisting of High Court judges, law professors and advocates from countries such as Brazil, China, India, the US and Netherlands drafted the Oslo Principles on Global Climate Change Obligations on March 30. These principles state that governments are legally obligated to prevent the destructive effects of climate change, regardless of existing international agreements, based on established international human rights, environmental, and tort laws.
"Courts can force countries to adopt effective climate policies. Court cases are perhaps the only way to break through the political apathy about climate change," Jaap Spier, Advocate-General to the Dutch Supreme Court, said in his interview with a local newspaper.
Spier added that a judge does not need to be an activist in order to comment on climate change.
"It is just a matter of applying existing law, although undoubtedly not all judges will be open to this. Judges with the courage to give a ruling on this will one day be applauded, whereas those who don't will eventually be tarred and feathered," Spier said.
Taking its lead from Urgenda and the 900 Dutch plaintiffs, a group of well-known Belgians have started legal proceedings against their government.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Climate Change Skeptics Lash Out At New Global Warming ‘Hiatus’ Study That Questions Ocean Temperature Measurements

Image
Share on facebook 227 Share on twitter 22 Share on linkedin Share on google_plusone_share More Sharing Services 128 An estimated 35,000 walruses are pictured crowding on a beach near Point Lay, Alaska, because of a lack of sea ice in this September 2014 photo. A study published June 4, 2015, refuting the notion that the Earth’s temperature rise has been interrupted since 1998 was lambasted by the usual skeptics and their supporters.  Corey Accardo/NOAA/NMFS/AFSC/NMML/Via Reuters A new climate study was released Thursday that refutes the claim that there’s been a slowdown, or “hiatus” in the rate the Earth is warming, but some conservative-leaning media sites skipped covering the study itself and chose instead to promote the views of the minority of climate change deniers, such as  Christopher Monckton . For example, the Drudge Report, an immensely popular headline aggregator operated by conservative Matthew Drudge, promi...
Read more

Global warming could drive world temperatures up 7 degrees by 2100

Another piece of the  global warming  puzzle has been revealed. According to new research published on Jan. 1 in the journal  Nature , increased levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere will reduce the number of clouds that form. This, in turn, will cause temperatures to rise much higher than previous climate-change models have predicted. According to this new research, global temperatures could rise 4 degrees Celsius or 7.2 degrees Fahrenheit by the year 2100, and twice that by 2200. Lead researcher Steven Sherwood at the Climate Change Research Center at Australia's University of New South Wales, told  The Guardian  that this level of climate change would be "catastrophic rather than simply dangerous. For example, it would make life difficult, if not impossible, in much of the tropics, and would guarantee the eventual melting of the Greenland ice sheet and some of the Antarctic ice sheet."   In a  news release , Sherwood said this new...
Read more

Why Is Critical Technology to Stop Global Warming Stalled?

Image
Pumping CO2 underground can help fight climate change but remains untested for the most part March 12, 2015  | By  Howard J. Herzog  and  The Conversation US Injection of CO2 and other gases into geological formations has been practiced for many years.  Credit:  SaskPower There are many uncertainties with respect to global climate change, but there is one thing about which I have no doubts: we will not solve climate change by running out of fossil fuels. Understanding this leads to three posible pathways we can follow to lower greenhouse gas concentrations, and explains why I’ve chosen to focus  my research  on carbon capture and storage. We can: continue to burn fossil fuels with little or no restrictions. We will blow by atmospheric CO2 concentrations of 450 parts per million (ppm), the level many scientists think is dangerous to exceed, and we will keep on going. We have enough fossil fuels to easily go above 1,000 ppm. The impac...
Read more